News

Phillies Win Court Ruling Over Mascot

A federal magistrate judge has decided that changes by the Philadelphia Phillies to the Phillie Phanatic mascot last year were sufficient to allow its continued use by the club. This was a major decision in favor of the team.

In a 91-page decision on Aug. 10, U.S. Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn in Manhattan decided that creators of the Phillie Phanatic had demonstrated the mascot had been registered as an artistic sculpture under copyright law. Netburn recommended that Harrison/Erickson, the New York company that created the Phanatic, be credited as sole authors of the Phanatic and said the company had the right to terminate the Phillies’ 1984 agreement to acquire rights to the fuzzy creature, which Harrison/Erickson did on June 15, 2020.

Last year, the Phillies unveiled the redesign of the green mascot and featured a new look of flightless feathers rather than fur-colored arms, stars outlining the eyes, a larger posterior and a powder blue tail, blue socks with red shoes and a set of scales under the arms.

“H/E argue that P2 is not original because it is the ‘same old Phanatic’ or a ‘slavish copy’ of P1,” Netburn wrote. “If the Phillies had designed something so dissimilar from the Phanatic that it would no longer be recognizable as the Phanatic, then, by extension, it would not be a derivative of the Phanatic, and instead would be a completely different mascot.” Netburn cited a 1991 U.S. Supreme Court decision, Feist Publications Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Company Inc. “To be sure, the changes to the structural shape of the Phanatic are no great strokes of brilliance,” she wrote. “But as the Supreme Court has already noted, a compilation of minimally creative elements, ‘no matter how crude, humble or obvious,’ can render a work a derivative.”

Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter!

A week of sports news in your in-box.
We find the sports news you need to know, so you don't have to.

Lawyers for Wayde Harrison and Bonnie Erickson also released a statement. “If left uncorrected this low bar for a derivative work will thwart the very purpose and intent of the copyright termination provisions established by Congress to fairly compensate original creators for their works 35 years after they have licensed or granted rights in their creations, as Bonnie and Wayde did in 1984,” they said. “The fight of the original creators for their just due will continue.”

The Phillies declined to comment, citing the ongoing litigation.

 

Richie McCarthy

Recent Posts

MLB Honors Braves’ Great Bob Horner After Death At 68

Bob Horner, one of the most recognizable names in Atlanta Braves history, died at age…

9 hours ago

Dodgers’ Kiké Hernández Suffers Another Injury & Prospects For Rest Of Season Don’t Look Great

Kiké Hernández and the Los Angeles Dodgers suffered another injury setback this week when the…

9 hours ago

Naomi Osaka Makes Waves At French Open With Her Wild Fashion Choices

Naomi Osaka had spectators on their feet after making a dramatic entrance for her French…

9 hours ago

James Harden Claims Cavaliers Are Better Team Than Knicks – Many Fans Beg To Differ

The Cleveland Cavaliers were swept in the Eastern Conference finals by the New York Knicks,…

9 hours ago

Lionel Messi Is Substituted For Muscle Fatigue During Inter Miami Match, Raising World Cup Concerns

Lionel Messi being substituted during an Inter Miami CF match due to muscle fatigue has…

2 days ago

Is Dodgers’ Star Freddie Freeman Getting Ready To Retire?

Freddie Freeman may be entering the final years of his Hall of Fame baseball career,…

2 days ago