News

Phillies Win Court Ruling Over Mascot

A federal magistrate judge has decided that changes by the Philadelphia Phillies to the Phillie Phanatic mascot last year were sufficient to allow its continued use by the club. This was a major decision in favor of the team.

In a 91-page decision on Aug. 10, U.S. Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn in Manhattan decided that creators of the Phillie Phanatic had demonstrated the mascot had been registered as an artistic sculpture under copyright law. Netburn recommended that Harrison/Erickson, the New York company that created the Phanatic, be credited as sole authors of the Phanatic and said the company had the right to terminate the Phillies’ 1984 agreement to acquire rights to the fuzzy creature, which Harrison/Erickson did on June 15, 2020.

Last year, the Phillies unveiled the redesign of the green mascot and featured a new look of flightless feathers rather than fur-colored arms, stars outlining the eyes, a larger posterior and a powder blue tail, blue socks with red shoes and a set of scales under the arms.

“H/E argue that P2 is not original because it is the ‘same old Phanatic’ or a ‘slavish copy’ of P1,” Netburn wrote. “If the Phillies had designed something so dissimilar from the Phanatic that it would no longer be recognizable as the Phanatic, then, by extension, it would not be a derivative of the Phanatic, and instead would be a completely different mascot.” Netburn cited a 1991 U.S. Supreme Court decision, Feist Publications Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Company Inc. “To be sure, the changes to the structural shape of the Phanatic are no great strokes of brilliance,” she wrote. “But as the Supreme Court has already noted, a compilation of minimally creative elements, ‘no matter how crude, humble or obvious,’ can render a work a derivative.”

Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter!

A week of sports news in your in-box.
We find the sports news you need to know, so you don't have to.

Lawyers for Wayde Harrison and Bonnie Erickson also released a statement. “If left uncorrected this low bar for a derivative work will thwart the very purpose and intent of the copyright termination provisions established by Congress to fairly compensate original creators for their works 35 years after they have licensed or granted rights in their creations, as Bonnie and Wayde did in 1984,” they said. “The fight of the original creators for their just due will continue.”

The Phillies declined to comment, citing the ongoing litigation.

 

Like
Like Love Haha Wow Sad Angry
Richie McCarthy

Recent Posts

Could The Raptors Get Even Better With Athony Davis?

The Toronto Raptors have been one of the NBA’s most pleasant surprises this season, but…

16 hours ago

3 Men Arrested For Burglary Of $200K In Property From Shedeur Sanders’ Home During Browns’ Game

There’s been a major breakthrough in the investigation of the break-in of Cleveland Browns quarterback…

16 hours ago

Was Firing Coach Mike McDaniel The Logical Move For Dolphins?

After four seasons and two playoff appearances, the Miami Dolphins will be moving on from…

17 hours ago

U.S. Patent & Trademark Office Blocks Athletics From Claiming ‘Las Vegas Athletics’ As Their Name

Whether it be fans or other owners, it seems that everyone wants to prevent the…

2 days ago

Don Mattingly Joins The Phillies – Will His Decades Of Experience Get Them Over The Top?

The former Yankees captain will join the Philadelphia Phillies bench as his lifelong pursuit of…

2 days ago

50 Sports Greats Who Died In 2025: College Football Head Coach Bill McCartney Died At 84

On January 10, legendary college football head coach Bill McCartney died from complications of dementia…

4 days ago