Categories: NewsOpinion

Michael Jordan Loses Lawsuit Regarding His ‘Jumpman’ Trademark

Six-time NBA champion, Michael Jordan recently lost a suit against the China based company, Qiaodan Sports Co, that attempted to revoke the trademark of the sportswear company under grounds that it was misleading consumers into thinking it was a Jordan Brand product.

The Qiaodan shoe’s ‘jumpman’ compared to the original, differs in that two bent knees are mimicking more of a dribbling crossover, where Jordan’s ‘jumpman’ has two straight legs and an extended arm, which mimics his famous air walk dunk.

In China, however, Jordan’s requests for a trial were denied, but when he appealed to the Beijing Higher People’s Court, they ruled against him, a Sohu news station reported.

Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter!

A week of sports news in your in-box.
We find the sports news you need to know, so you don't have to.

When Jordan first issued his claim, he released a statement saying,

“I am very happy that the Chinese courts have accepted my case to protect the use of my name and the interests of Chinese consumers. Qiaodan Sports has built a business off my Chinese name, the number 23, and even attempted to use the names of my children, without authorization. I think Chinese consumers deserve to be protected from being misled, and they should know exactly what they are buying. I am taking this action to preserve the ownership of my name and my brand. No one should lose control of their own name, and the acceptance of my case shows that China recognizes that this is true for everyone. After all, what’s more personal than your name?

 

The court’s decision was based off of the reasoning that “’Jordan’ is not the only possible reference for ‘Qiaodan’ in the trademark under dispute. In addition, ‘Jordan’ is a common surname used by Americans.” For this reason, the court said that consumers would not be misled in thinking that the particular ‘jumpman’ was Jordan, further explaining that there insufficient evidence to prove it.

While it may seem overly aggressive of Jordan to challenge a similar trademark, China is on the US’s Priority Watch List of trading partners that have lax protection of intellectual property rights – many times being seen as a counterfeiters’ heaven.

The company under dispute, Qiaodan Sports Co, which is based in the eastern province of Fujian, has not issued a counter statement.

Pete Aragones

Recent Posts

Los Angeles Chargers Center Bradley Bozman Defends QB Justin Herbert After Dangerous Hit

Los Angeles Chargers center Bradley Bozeman stuck up for his quarterback Justin Herbert during last…

13 hours ago

VIDEO: Milwaukee Bucks’ Bobby Portis Says ‘Prized Possessions’ Stolen In Home Invasion

https://youtu.be/v4jY78n7Wnk Milwaukee Bucks forward Bobby Portis said his home in the Milwaukee suburb of River…

14 hours ago

Braves & Angels Start Off-Season With Splash, Announce Jorge Soler Trade Hours After World Series

The Atlanta Braves kicked off the MLB off-season with a bang Thursday, trading away veteran…

1 day ago

Broncos Coach Sean Payton Tells Panthers To ‘Play Better’ After Being Accused Of Running Up The Score

Denver Broncos head coach Sean Payton made sure to get his money’s worth as his…

1 day ago

Lakers’ Bronny James Scores First NBA Basket, Receives Ovation From Cleveland Crowd

Well on the way to a blowout defeat Wednesday night, Los Angeles Lakers head coach…

3 days ago

VIDEO: Consulate General Of Japan In L.A. Shouts-Out Japanese Players While Congratulating Dodgers On Their Win

https://youtu.be/hNWFWqqwEiA The Consulate General of Japan in Los Angeles congratulated the Dodgers on winning the…

3 days ago