MANCHESTER, ENGLAND - SEPTEMBER 20: Casemiro of Manchester United celebrates scoring his team's second goal with teammate Bruno Fernandes during the Premier League match between Manchester United and Chelsea at Old Trafford on September 20, 2025 in Manchester, England. (Photo by Alex Livesey/Getty Images)
Manchester United released a public statement after their co-owner Jim Ratcliffe said that the United Kingdom had been “colonized by immigrants.”
“Manchester United prides itself on being an inclusive and welcoming club,” Manchester United officials said.
Ratcliffe himself has also walked back on his comments somewhat.
“I am sorry that my choice of language has offended some people in the U.K. and Europe and caused concern,” Ratcliffe said, “But it is important to raise the issue of controlled and well-managed immigration that supports economic growth.”
Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter!
A week of sports news in your in-box.
We find the sports news you need to know, so you don't have to.
Ratcliffe also defended his comments by saying that governments must manage migration with investments in industry, skill and jobs. Ratcliffe made these comments during an interview with Sky News.
The Manchester United Muslim Supporters’ Club, a fan group that unites Manchester United fans who are practicing Muslims, was unhappy with Ratcliffe’s defense.
“We have noted Sir Jim Ratcliffe’s apology for his ‘choice of language’,” the group said, “However, we do not believe this sufficiently addresses the seriousness of what was said.”
The Football Association (FA) could choose to punish Ratcliffe. The rulebook provides some precedent for punishing representatives of teams (employees, players, owners,etc) for private comments.
Rule E3.1 says, “A participant shall at all times act in the best interests of the game and shall not act in any manner which is improper or brings the game into disrepute or use any one, or a combination of, violent conduct, serious foul play, threatening, abusive, indecent or insulting words or behaviour.”
Rule E3.2 says that a violation of Rule E3.1 would be considered an “aggravated breach” if the comments included references to ethnic origin, color, race, nationality, religious beliefs, gender (including gender reassignment), sexual orientation or disability.
There is no news of any formal investigations into Ratcliffe’s comments at this time.
The transition from college football to the NFL is one of the most uncertain periods…
The summer transfer window is underway across Europe, with many of the continent’s biggest clubs…
Texas Tech QB Brendan Sorsby is eligible to play college football in 2026—despite controversy.One of…
Alex Bregman was expected to be a key addition for the Chicago Cubs when he…
The Los Angeles Rams are in the news—not for Miles Garrett, but because left tackle…
The San Antonio Spurs survived Game 3 at Madison Square Garden to breathe new life…